Honda Fit vs Nissan Juke
The Honda Fit is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 30 mpg for the Nissan Juke, a 6 mpg advantage and costs about $850 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Honda Fit leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2017
Nissan Juke
Small Station Wagons · 15 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Honda Fit | Nissan Juke |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 36 mpg ✓ | 30 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 33 mpg ✓ | 28 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 40 mpg ✓ | 33 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $1,700 ✓ | $2,550 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 246 g/mi ✓ | 297 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI | SIDI, 1.6 |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AV-S7), Automatic (variable gear ratios), Manual 6-spd | Automatic (AV-S7), Manual 6-spd, Automatic (AV-S8) |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular | Premium |
| EPA class | Small Station Wagons | Small Station Wagons |
| Years covered | 2015–2020 | 2015–2017 |
| Configurations on record | 18 | 15 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Fit vs Juke: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Honda Fit or the Nissan Juke?
The Honda Fit is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 30 mpg for the Nissan Juke, a 6 mpg advantage and costs about $850 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Honda Fit runs about $1,700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,550 for the Nissan Juke — a difference of roughly $850 per year.
What engines do the Fit and Juke offer?
Honda Fit: SIDI. Nissan Juke: SIDI, 1.6.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Honda Fit and the Nissan Juke as Small Station Wagons, so they compete directly.
More Fit comparisons
Comparison id: honda-fit-vs-nissan-juke