Ram C/V vs Mazda 5
The Mazda 5 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 24 mpg combined versus 21 mpg for the Ram C/V, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $400 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Mazda 5 leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Ram C/V | Mazda 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 21 mpg | 24 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 18 mpg | 21 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 26 mpg | 28 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,950 | $2,550 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 433 g/mi | 370 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | 3.6, FFV | 2.5 |
| Transmissions | Automatic 6-spd | Automatic (S5) |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Gasoline or E85 | Regular |
| EPA class | Minivan - 2WD | Minivan - 2WD |
| Years covered | 2015–2015 | 2015–2015 |
| Configurations on record | 2 | 1 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
C/V vs 5: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Ram C/V or the Mazda 5?
The Mazda 5 is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 24 mpg combined versus 21 mpg for the Ram C/V, a 3 mpg advantage and costs about $400 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Mazda 5 runs about $2,550 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,950 for the Ram C/V — a difference of roughly $400 per year.
What engines do the C/V and 5 offer?
Ram C/V: 3.6, FFV. Mazda 5: 2.5.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Ram C/V and the Mazda 5 as Minivan - 2WD, so they compete directly.
More C/V comparisons
Comparison id: ram-cv-vs-mazda-5