Nissan Juke vs Honda Fit
The Honda Fit is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 30 mpg for the Nissan Juke, a 6 mpg advantage and costs about $850 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Honda Fit leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
2015–2017
Nissan Juke
Small Station Wagons · 15 configurations
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Nissan Juke | Honda Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 30 mpg | 36 mpg ✓ |
| Best city MPG | 28 mpg | 33 mpg ✓ |
| Best highway MPG | 33 mpg | 40 mpg ✓ |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $2,550 | $1,700 ✓ |
| Lowest CO2 output | 297 g/mi | 246 g/mi ✓ |
| Engines offered | SIDI, 1.6 | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AV-S7), Manual 6-spd, Automatic (AV-S8) | Automatic (AV-S7), Automatic (variable gear ratios), Manual 6-spd |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Premium | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Station Wagons | Small Station Wagons |
| Years covered | 2015–2017 | 2015–2020 |
| Configurations on record | 15 | 18 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Juke vs Fit: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Nissan Juke or the Honda Fit?
The Honda Fit is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 36 mpg combined versus 30 mpg for the Nissan Juke, a 6 mpg advantage and costs about $850 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Honda Fit runs about $1,700 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $2,550 for the Nissan Juke — a difference of roughly $850 per year.
What engines do the Juke and Fit offer?
Nissan Juke: SIDI, 1.6. Honda Fit: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Nissan Juke and the Honda Fit as Small Station Wagons, so they compete directly.
More Juke comparisons
Comparison id: nissan-juke-vs-honda-fit