Lotus Evora vs Fiat 500e

The Fiat 500e is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 20 mpg for the Lotus Evora, a 96 mpg advantage and costs about $3,150 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Fiat 500e leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2017–2021

Lotus Evora

Minicompact Cars · 10 configurations

20mpg combined (best)
All Lotus Evora specs

2015–2026

Fiat 500e

Minicompact Cars · 11 configurations

116mpg combined (best)
All Fiat 500e specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricLotus EvoraFiat 500e
Best combined MPG20 mpg116 mpg
Best city MPG17 mpg127 mpg
Best highway MPG26 mpg108 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$3,800$650
Lowest CO2 output438 g/miNot available
Engines offered3.5Not available
TransmissionsManual 6-spd, Automatic (S6)Automatic (A1)
DrivetrainsRear-Wheel DriveFront-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesPremiumElectricity
EPA classMinicompact CarsMinicompact Cars
Years covered2017–20212015–2026
Configurations on record1011

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

Evora vs 500e: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Lotus Evora or the Fiat 500e?

The Fiat 500e is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 20 mpg for the Lotus Evora, a 96 mpg advantage and costs about $3,150 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Fiat 500e runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $3,800 for the Lotus Evora — a difference of roughly $3,150 per year.

What engines do the Evora and 500e offer?

Lotus Evora: 3.5. Fiat 500e: no engine data on record.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Lotus Evora and the Fiat 500e as Minicompact Cars, so they compete directly.

More Evora comparisons

Comparison id: lotus-evora-vs-fiat-500e