Kia Niro vs Honda Fit
The Kia Niro is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 113 mpg combined versus 36 mpg for the Honda Fit, a 77 mpg advantage and costs about $1,050 less per year to fuel.
Across 5 measured categories, the Kia Niro leads in 5. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.
Head-to-head specifications
| Metric | Kia Niro | Honda Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Best combined MPG | 113 mpg ✓ | 36 mpg |
| Best city MPG | 126 mpg ✓ | 33 mpg |
| Best highway MPG | 102 mpg ✓ | 40 mpg |
| Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year | $650 ✓ | $1,700 |
| Lowest CO2 output | 71 g/mi ✓ | 246 g/mi |
| Engines offered | SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI | SIDI |
| Transmissions | Automatic (AM-S6), Automatic (A1), Automatic (AM6) | Automatic (AV-S7), Automatic (variable gear ratios), Manual 6-spd |
| Drivetrains | Front-Wheel Drive | Front-Wheel Drive |
| Fuel types | Regular, Regular Gas and Electricity, Electricity | Regular |
| EPA class | Small Station Wagons | Small Station Wagons |
| Years covered | 2017–2027 | 2015–2020 |
| Configurations on record | 43 | 18 |
Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.
Niro vs Fit: common questions
Which is better on gas, the Kia Niro or the Honda Fit?
The Kia Niro is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 113 mpg combined versus 36 mpg for the Honda Fit, a 77 mpg advantage and costs about $1,050 less per year to fuel.
Which costs less to run per year?
By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Kia Niro runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $1,700 for the Honda Fit — a difference of roughly $1,050 per year.
What engines do the Niro and Fit offer?
Kia Niro: SIDI; Hybrid, SIDI; PHEV, SIDI. Honda Fit: SIDI.
Are they in the same vehicle class?
Yes — the EPA classifies both the Kia Niro and the Honda Fit as Small Station Wagons, so they compete directly.
More Niro comparisons
Comparison id: kia-niro-vs-honda-fit