Fiat 500e vs Lotus Evora

The Fiat 500e is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 20 mpg for the Lotus Evora, a 96 mpg advantage and costs about $3,150 less per year to fuel.

Across 4 measured categories, the Fiat 500e leads in 4. Figures are EPA test data, not manufacturer claims.

2015–2026

Fiat 500e

Minicompact Cars · 11 configurations

116mpg combined (best)
All Fiat 500e specs

2017–2021

Lotus Evora

Minicompact Cars · 10 configurations

20mpg combined (best)
All Lotus Evora specs

Head-to-head specifications

MetricFiat 500eLotus Evora
Best combined MPG116 mpg20 mpg
Best city MPG127 mpg17 mpg
Best highway MPG108 mpg26 mpg
Lowest annual fuel costEPA estimate at 15,000 miles per year$650$3,800
Lowest CO2 outputNot available438 g/mi
Engines offeredNot available3.5
TransmissionsAutomatic (A1)Manual 6-spd, Automatic (S6)
DrivetrainsFront-Wheel DriveRear-Wheel Drive
Fuel typesElectricityPremium
EPA classMinicompact CarsMinicompact Cars
Years covered2015–20262017–2021
Configurations on record1110

Source: EPA fuel economy records via fueleconomy.gov. Best-case values across all recorded configurations for each model.

500e vs Evora: common questions

Which is better on gas, the Fiat 500e or the Lotus Evora?

The Fiat 500e is the more efficient of the two: it reaches 116 mpg combined versus 20 mpg for the Lotus Evora, a 96 mpg advantage and costs about $3,150 less per year to fuel.

Which costs less to run per year?

By EPA estimates at 15,000 miles a year, the Fiat 500e runs about $650 a year in fuel at its most efficient configuration, versus about $3,800 for the Lotus Evora — a difference of roughly $3,150 per year.

What engines do the 500e and Evora offer?

Fiat 500e: no engine data on record. Lotus Evora: 3.5.

Are they in the same vehicle class?

Yes — the EPA classifies both the Fiat 500e and the Lotus Evora as Minicompact Cars, so they compete directly.

More 500e comparisons

Comparison id: fiat-500e-vs-lotus-evora